Showing posts with label Movies. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Movies. Show all posts

Thursday, June 05, 2008

The Life of a Bullet

Several weeks ago we rented "The Kingdom." It is a movie I would recommend, though not for the kids. It depicts a fictional terrorist attack on a military base in Saudi Arabia and the ensuing American response. The movie is raw, which for some reason I typically interpret as realistic. I guess that's exactly what the director is hoping for.

The American government team sent to "investigate" the crime scene goes without proper authority, but in a fit of emotional fervor the leader puts together a team committed to bringing a kind of justice to a fallen friend and comrade. The story depicts experienced and maybe "smarter," self-assured American investigators jumping into the "crime scene" evidently oblivious to the culture, and even cavalier regarding it. Acting as if the Americans have a thing or two to teach the Saudis about how to run a proper investigation, they are constantly frustrated and their progress is blocked for religious, cultural, and political reasons they never grasp.

The movie's climax ends with a dramatic chase and shoot out among the terrorist group in the city, including women and children (used as manipulative pawns). Without giving too much away, one of the last things we see is the patriarch master-mind passing on his legacy to a grand child close by him in his dying breath. In essence, he tells his kid to never stop killing the Americans until they're obliterated. The movie ends, though it was never intended to end this way, and the tragedy of children involved in violence and wars much bigger than them and ones they don't understand is perpetuated.

This ending reminded me of the brilliant opening of Lord of War. This portion of the movie has ironically been called "The Life of a Bullet." Ironic, because the sole intent of a bullet is to squash life. Follow the path of a bullet from a Russian manufacturing plant, into the Russian military, then eventually handed over into corrupt hands.



Saturday, December 01, 2007

Time for Lord of the Rings

This is the time of year that I get the irresistible urge to watch the entire Lord of the Rings trilogy. I love these movies. I love the story, I love the grand scale of the movies, I love the acting, I love detail of the smallest minutia. I love the sound track. And I love the extended edtion DVDs (thanks, Jason!) with all the behind the scenes interviews and commentary. I appreciate the vision of Peter Jackson and I'm really excited that he is now going to be directing "The Hobbit." Rumors are that he'll be filming it in 3D as well!

Why do I get the urge to watch these movies this time of year? I guess because this is the time when the movies were released both theatrically and when the extended DVDs were released.

So far, I've watched the first disc of The Fellowship and I am nearing the end of the second disc. Right now, Boromir is trying to take the ring from Frodo. I'll probably watch the rest of the trilogy over the next couple of weeks.

Wednesday, December 13, 2006

Beauty and the Beast


We had the DVD from Blockbuster's mail service sitting by our TV for probably three weeks or so. Just never got around to watching it. Finally, I was able to convince my wife to give it a try. We put the kids to bed, popped some popcorn and put on Peter Jackson's King Kong.

I had seen this version of the movie once before. In the theater when it was released. If you have never seen PJ's version of King Kong, you should rent it. It takes a while to get moving, but we have to decide that we like Ann Darrow (Naomi Watts) and are at least suspicious of Carl Denham (Jack Black). Liking Ann was easy, and Carl was easy to like--and dislike as Jack Black did his con-artisty job of getting everyone he needed imprisoned on a ship bound for an uncharted isle. (Sounds like the makings of a bad sit-com).

PJ's version of this story is a little bit like Kong meets Jurassic Park. It's a long movie too. It took us two nights to watch the whole thing. Janet watched about two-thirds of it then decided it was time for her to go to bed.

As I watched this movie again, a thought struck me. There would never have been a story if anyone other than Ann/Naomi had been taken by the big ape. I mean, suppose the smug film director Carl/Jack was taken away by Kong. The rest of the guys from the boat would have said (in their best Seinfeld voice), "Hum, yeah, that's a shame," and probably would have booked it on out of there. But since the lovely Ann/Naomi went missing, all the guys just had to go after her. Had Jack gone missing, it would have been a much shorter story.

Let's see....which would YOU have gone after?






















So here are some questions of logistics: 1) Once knocked out by a singular bottle of chloriform, how did they get Mr. Kong up onto/into the boat? 2) Are there really any more uncharted islands? 3) How did the natives come up with the technology to keep Kong out of their quaint little settlement? 4) What girl in her right mind would scale the Empire State Building? 5) Are there really that many ladders and steps to the top? 6) Could one stand at the top really? with a 25 foot monkey? 7) Come on now, can Kong really beat up three T-rex dinosaurs? 8) if you're a passer-by in Manhattan and there's a big ape on top of the ESB, and planes are firing on him to kill, would you stand down there at the foot of the building waiting for him to fall? 9) if you're Jack Driscoll/Adrien Brody, how do you feel coming in a close second to a big ape? That can't help your self-esteem.

Monday, May 22, 2006

Da Vinci Hype

Gary brought it out of me. Didn't really mean to go on this little tirade, but I did. It is copied from the comment section of his blog post, which is an interesting review of the movie. Here are my comments and questions:

Our church, like many others, has been gearing up for the whole Da Vinci event recently. Sermons, guest lecturers, etc., have all come and warned of the herecies and inconsistencies in both the book and the movie.

I remember back when I was in college and the first Gulf War began. I was at Cedarville and there was a learned man who came to speak in one of our daily chapel services to warn us that so many things pointed to the end being near. "Jesus is coming any minute," was his big speach. He scared us all to death, in some ways, making parallels of world events to an interpretation of the last days. At this time too, there were lots of books writen about Iraq as Babylon, all sorts of articles appeared in Christian literature pointing out the parallels.

Then the year 2000. A flip of the calendar, yet somehow we, as the church, needed to be ready for disaster, because that chip with the old date sub routine written in it in the gas meter by our house was gonna explode, even though the date routine was never required of it. More hysteria, more books, more articles, get your canned foods, find shelter, be ready for anything. And a lot of it coming from and for the Christian community.

So now we have Da Vinci, and pardon my cynicism, but where was everybody when Indiana Jones raided the "Lost Ark?" "God-in-a-Box" theology with a great adventure and everything. And the "Last Crusade?" "It's time to ask yourself 'what do you believe?', Dr. Jones..." What? that the holy grail if administered correctly gives healing powers and immortality--but wait, only if you stay behind that line.

What is it that is so new that the Christian community has to study up on because of the release of this book/movie? What skewed biblical principles are being put forth that have not already assulted the Truth of God's word in other writings, books, tv shows and movies for centuries? Why now?

What person, having seen Indiana Jones is going to ask quesitons about God, and eternal life, and the holy grail? What person, after reading or watching Da Vinci is going to start an argument with a known Christian over the elements of the story and their veracity?

Why now is the Christian community suddenly implored to learn how to defend what they believe, when all along, and all around them (us) doctrines of theology and morality have been attacked for years? We are being instructed on how to debunk Da Vinci as though that is the argument to be made. As the fabled story goes (is it true?) bankers learn to identify counterfeit bills not be studying the counterfeits, but by studying the real thing.

So let's ignore the hype and be ready, Da Vinci or not, to be able to defend the reason for the hope found within us.



What do you think?

Thursday, January 19, 2006

Random Thoughts and Mutterings

This idea was stolen from Gary U. I'm feeling guilty about neglecting this for so long so it's time for another bulletpoint list of stuff.

  • North Raleigh is a busy place
  • It is generally warmer in Raleigh than Akron
  • Rhythm sections still rush in Raleigh
  • Brass players are still too loud in Raleigh
  • YMCAs cost about twice here what they do in Akron
  • They are also three or four times the size
  • Weights seem heavier here
  • We've just experienced our first pounding (that's a good thing)
  • There is a GREAT full time jazz radio station in Raleigh
  • There is a GREAT full time classical radio station in Raleigh
  • There is no Mike Trivisonno in Raleigh
  • There is no Major League Baseball team in Raleigh
  • People are generally more friendly in NC--at least they're happy to talk with you for a while
  • There are a lot of trees in NC--especially the evergreen variety
  • My office has a window
  • You only have to have one license plate on the back of your vehicle
  • We have to take a written driver's test before we can get our NC driver's license
  • Most left turns have their own signal, which means that even if there's no oncoming traffic, you still have to wait until you get the arrow
  • We get paid only once a month
  • DSL is available everywhere down here
  • Providence has three packed out services and the over flow building is overflowing
  • I have to think of a birthday present for my wife
  • Austin wonders if people who speak with a southern accent (which is just about everybody) are speaking a different language
  • The Island wasn't that great of a movie
  • Hotel Rwanda was excellent
  • I have a hard time knowing whether or not bullet statements should get periods. Maybe Rob can help.